Tuesday, 19 October 2010
Reebok Advert featuring 50 cent- Wigley
Monday, 18 October 2010
Dominant/Alternative Representations- Bush
The advert was produced by Nike, a world wide company which produces products for Men, Women and Children.
In this advert the social group which appears is women.
This advert has both dominant and alternative representations. The alternative representation is the girl street/break dancing. This is alternative because we as a society normally associate this genre of dancing to boys and men, however in this advert a girl is doing it and is just as good as if a boy was to do it. This representation was a positive representation as it goes against the normal stereoptyical views of a girl. This representation was most likely chosen to sell the Nike product to girl, but it also connote equality which would show that the brand Nike is a non sexiest brand.
The audience can relate to this advert because of maybe their gender to begin with. They may feel that because a female can do dancing like that they are more equal to males. Also they could relate to advert through their interests, some girls are interested in dancing and may take it up themselfs. Another way to relate to this advert may be through their social class. Nike is a more of a middle class/ working class brand so girls may feel that they can afford the Nike products and look just as good as the girl in the advert.
Lynx
The advert was produced by Lynx deodorant, which is specifically design just for men.
This advert is a dominate representation by having lots of women following him shows the dominant ideology because it sticks to the belifs of women chasig after men. The representation of this was postive towards men but negative towards women as they are shown as a subornat group.
Banned Adverts-Wigley
I believe that this advert was banned from TV because of the violence and horror it contained. This advert was for a the company Nike which is a family brand. Therefore by having such horrifying scenes it would have scared their target audience.
Also this advert would have been shown during the day time hours, this would have meant that a younger audience would have been watching therefore frighting them.
I do think that the advert should have been banned because I felt quite scared and threatened by the advert and I don't think that the message got across, it only scared me.
This advert was banned because of it explicit language. What made the advert worse was that a young child aged at around 7-9 was using it. If this was shown on TV it would have connoted to younger children that it is ok to use this word and also as the girl picked it up from her father the young audience watching the advert would have picked the word up and started using it.
I think that this advert should have been banned because if it wasn't that would have meant younger kids would start to swear and use the language used in the advert.
This advert was banned because of it stereotypical view on a social group. The social group being blonde's, and society view being that blond are "dumb, stupid bimbo's"
I do think the adverts should have been banned because of the way it represented the girl. After watching this people may have negative attitudes towards this particular group
Thursday, 7 October 2010
Media Awards Analysis-Bush
by Shaurav, Nick, Raheam, Vivek-Best sound track
by Bilal, Bianca and Asha- Best movie trailer