I believe that this advert was banned from TV because of the violence and horror it contained. This advert was for a the company Nike which is a family brand. Therefore by having such horrifying scenes it would have scared their target audience.
Also this advert would have been shown during the day time hours, this would have meant that a younger audience would have been watching therefore frighting them.
I do think that the advert should have been banned because I felt quite scared and threatened by the advert and I don't think that the message got across, it only scared me.
This advert was banned because of it explicit language. What made the advert worse was that a young child aged at around 7-9 was using it. If this was shown on TV it would have connoted to younger children that it is ok to use this word and also as the girl picked it up from her father the young audience watching the advert would have picked the word up and started using it.
I think that this advert should have been banned because if it wasn't that would have meant younger kids would start to swear and use the language used in the advert.
This advert was banned because of it stereotypical view on a social group. The social group being blonde's, and society view being that blond are "dumb, stupid bimbo's"
I do think the adverts should have been banned because of the way it represented the girl. After watching this people may have negative attitudes towards this particular group
No comments:
Post a Comment